Re: [PATCH 7/7] revoke: wire up s390 system calls
- From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:28:39 -0600
Quoting Martin Schwidefsky (schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx):
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 17:41 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
Yes, please put me or Heiko on CC if you add system calls to s390.
Ok, sorry about that. I would expect akpm to send it to you guys though
whenever revoke graduates from -mm and not merge it to mainline.
Yes, but nobody is perfect. Even Andrew sometimes forgets to add people
to CC who should know about "stuff". It would be nice if the CC-line is
added from the start.
Sorry, I should have cc:d you when I sent my testing patch to Pekka.
-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH 7/7] revoke: wire up s390 system calls
- From: Pekka J Enberg
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] revoke: wire up s390 system calls
- From: Arnd Bergmann
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] revoke: wire up s390 system calls
- From: Martin Schwidefsky
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] revoke: wire up s390 system calls
- From: Pekka Enberg
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] revoke: wire up s390 system calls
- From: Martin Schwidefsky
- [PATCH 7/7] revoke: wire up s390 system calls
- Prev by Date: Re: the usage of DEBUG_DRIVER seems ambiguous
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 7/7] revoke: wire up s390 system calls
- Next by thread: [PATCH 5/7] revoke: add documentation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
