Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 21:37:07 +0530
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 06:41:05PM +0300, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
right, but atomic ops have much less impact on most
architectures than locks :)
Right. But atomic_add_unless() is slower as it is
essentially a loop. See my previous letter in this sub-thread.
If I am not mistaken, you shouldn't loop in normal cases, which means
it boils down to a atomic_read() + atomic_cmpxch()
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- From: Pavel Emelianov
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- References:
- [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Resource controllers based on process containers
- From: Pavel Emelianov
- [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- From: Pavel Emelianov
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- From: Balbir Singh
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- From: Pavel Emelianov
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- From: Herbert Poetzl
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- From: Herbert Poetzl
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- From: Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- From: Herbert Poetzl
- Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- From: Pavel Emelianov
- [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Resource controllers based on process containers
- Prev by Date: Re: _proxy_pda still makes linking modules fail
- Next by Date: Re: Keyboard stops working after *lock [Was: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1]
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] Resource counters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|