Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #2]

From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 14:23:13 +0000

Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If your messages are datagrams and unreliable -> SOCK_DGRAM

Nope.

If your messages are datagrams and reliable -> SOCK_RDM

Nope.

If your messages are datagrams, reliable and ordered -> SOCK_SEQPACKET

Nope.

If your messages are streams of bits, reliable and ordered -> SOCK_STREAM

Nope.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #2]
  - From: David Howells
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #2]
  - From: Alan Cox

References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #2]
  - From: Alan Cox
- [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #2]
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/5] AF_RXRPC: Make it possible to merely try to cancel timers and delayed work [try #2]
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm/filemap.c: unconditionally call mark_page_accessed
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #2]
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #2]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread