Re: RSDL v0.31
- From: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 10:58:54 +0100
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 20:48 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
The most frustrating part of a discussion of this nature on lkml is that
earlier information in a thread seems to be long forgotten after a few days
and all that is left is the one reporter having a problem.
One? I'm not the only person who reported regression.
-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RSDL v0.31
- From: Mark Lord
- Re: RSDL v0.31
- From: Al Boldi
- Re: [ck] Re: RSDL v0.31
- From: michael chang
- Re: RSDL v0.31
- From: Mike Galbraith
- Re: RSDL v0.31
- References:
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] RSDL completely fair starvation free interactive cpu scheduler
- From: Al Boldi
- Re: RSDL v0.31
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: RSDL v0.31
- From: Serge Belyshev
- Re: RSDL v0.31
- From: Con Kolivas
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] RSDL completely fair starvation free interactive cpu scheduler
- Prev by Date: Re: [BUG] 2.6.21-rc1,2,3 regressions on my system that I found so far
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sys_fallocate() system call
- Previous by thread: Re: RSDL v0.31
- Next by thread: Re: RSDL v0.31
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|