Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #3]
- From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:22:25 +0000
Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some of them don't seem to be making it through to the list and are
dropped each time btw
Yeah. It's a size issue. The fifth patch is a third of a megabyte. The
patches at the URLs should now be updated (I'd forgotten to do that before
sending the emails).
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #3]
- From: Alan Cox
- [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #3]
- From: David Howells
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #3]
- Prev by Date: Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.21-rc4-mm1
- Next by Date: [PATCH 2/5] AF_RXRPC: Move generic skbuff stuff from XFRM code to generic code [try #3]
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] AF_RXRPC socket family implementation [try #3]
- Next by thread: [PATCH 2/5] AF_RXRPC: Move generic skbuff stuff from XFRM code to generic code [try #3]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
