Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus
- From: Al Boldi <a1426z@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:58:15 +0300
Mike Galbraith wrote:
Yesterday, I piddled around with tracking interactive backlog as a way
to detect when the load isn't really an interactive load, that's very
simple and has potential.
You may want to consider fixing latencies per nice relative to load, as the
biggest problem with iab are huge latency delays, which exhibit themselves
as starvation, caused by unfair timeslice management.
Thanks!
--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Prev by Date: [patch 2/6] Allow percpu variables to be page-aligned
- Next by Date: [patch 4/6] Convert PDA into the percpu section
- Previous by thread: [patch 0/6] i386 gdt and percpu cleanups
- Next by thread: 2.6.21-rc5: Thinkpad X60 gets critical thermal shutdowns
- Index(es):