Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 06:56:42 -0400
Alan Cox wrote:
Then no SFF hardware can use ata_irq_ack. Not one card: Because in every
OK
We should just rename ata_irq_ack(). It is in libata-sff, so it's either
wrong (missing a test), or in the wrong file completely.
There is plenty of BMDMA-specific stuff in libata-sff, so neither assertion is correct.
It's fine to rename it, though.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Jeff Garzik
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- References:
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Russell King
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Jeff Garzik
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- Prev by Date: Troll Of The Year (Was: REISER4 FOR INCLUSION IN THE LINUX KERNEL.)
- Next by Date: Re: [BUG] scheduler: first timeslice of the exiting thread
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|