Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 12:36:27 +0100
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 07:13:05AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
It should be noted, mainly for russell's benefit, that the ->irq_ack()
hook is only called if a debug define is manually enabled in libata.h,
in a single callsite.
The number of people that actually use the hook -- kernel hackers
debugging screaming interrupts -- can probably be counted on one hand.
Ok, in that case it makes sense for me to set this to ata_dummy_irq_ack
since I don't have any additional status registers specific to the
interface.
Presumably a similar change to pata_platform.c would be appropriate?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Jeff Garzik
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- References:
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Russell King
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Jeff Garzik
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Jeff Garzik
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- From: Jeff Garzik
- Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] trivial: s/i_sem /i_mutex/
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] pata_icside driver
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|