Re: If not readdir() then what?
- From: Bernd Eckenfels <ecki@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:45:32 +0200
In article <1176250921.309.94.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> you wrote:
Otherwise, the client would have to cache _all_ previous READDIR results
since the last opendir()/rewinddir() in order to be able to do its own
loop detection and that will obviously never scale for large directories
or for directories that change frequently...
Unless you have a COW style filesystem with versioning (think oracle tables)
you will have to invalidate cookies often or do copies - on client or
server. And I am not sure whats worse (for apps)... disappearing/missing
files or duplicates.
Gruss
bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: If not readdir() then what?
- From: Trond Myklebust
- Re: If not readdir() then what?
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2/8] [Intel IOMMU] Some generic search functions required to lookup device relationships.
- Next by Date: Re: link error : 2.6.21-rc6-mm1 for s390
- Previous by thread: Re: If not readdir() then what?
- Next by thread: Re: If not readdir() then what?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|