Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS]



On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 09:20:46PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
so Linus was right: this was caused by scheduler starvation. I can see
one immediate problem already: the 'nice offset' is not divided by
nr_running as it should. The patch below should fix this but i have yet
to test it accurately, this change might as well render nice levels
unacceptably ineffective under high loads.

I've been suggesting testing CPU bandwidth allocation as influenced by
nice numbers for a while now for a reason.


-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Relevant Pages