Re: AppArmor FAQ

James Morris wrote:
This is not what the discussion is about. It's about addressing the many
points in the FAQ posted here which are likely to cause misunderstandings,
and then subsequent responses of a similar nature.

Thank you. Then I misunderstood, and I owe you an apology. Thank you
for your patience and for correcting my mistaken impression.

For what it's worth, I agreed with most or all of the comments you made
in your original response to the FAQ posted here. I thought they were
constructive. What got me to ranting was an email from Karl MacMillan
that seemed focused more on debating the merits of AppArmor rather than
on improving the FAQ.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Relevant Pages

  • Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
    ... arithmetic truth/semantics and FOL syntactical proof as if they both ... were of the same nature. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: My talk about Godel to the post-grads.
    ... I wonder if misunderstandings of the nature of Godel's work would be ... use the phrase "to put it roughly" before the sentence and I'm not ... saying Curry misunderstood GIT. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Exactly what is a genius?
    ... thread have dealt only with misunderstandings of the nature ... of mathematical induction by you and DougL and with Remus's ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Beginners list
    ... # nature, are notoriously easy places for misunderstandings to occur. ... # first language may not be English, ...
    (comp.databases.oracle.server)