Re: Major qla2xxx regression on sparc64
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:16:32 +0100
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:28:07AM -0700, Seokmann Ju wrote:
Hello David,
On Mon 4/16/2007 10:02 PM, David Miller wrote:
Here, I've attached updated patch. Please take this.I'm in transit for a redeye to NY so I won't be able to modify the
patch, If you would be amenable to the above, Seokmann, could you
rework the patch?
Thanks guys.
Sorry for late.
I don't think there should be a warning in the sparc case where the
wwn's are stored in the device tree. This is the way sun intended
the hardware to work on sparc.
Yep, that's the main point.
Sun provides device parameters via openprom properties in lieu
of existing mechanisms chip vendors usually use for this on
other platforms such as NVRAM and the BIOS.
They do this for just about every scsi, networking, and video
chip. It works this way on PowerPC as well.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Major qla2xxx regression on sparc64
- From: David Miller
- RE: Major qla2xxx regression on sparc64
- From: Seokmann Ju
- Re: Major qla2xxx regression on sparc64
- From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: Major qla2xxx regression on sparc64
- Prev by Date: Re: Major qla2xxx regression on sparc64
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Kill off legacy power management stuff.
- Previous by thread: Re: Major qla2xxx regression on sparc64
- Next by thread: Re: Major qla2xxx regression on sparc64
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|