Re: Linux 2.6.21

El Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:02:28 -0400, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@xxxxxxxxxx> escribió:

Problem is, not enough developers pay attention to the -stable
series. Adrian, maybe you could shift your attention there and
stop trying to track the bleeding edge?

From my humble POV, it's a problem that all this discussion was generated
on what Adrian does or stop doing. Apparently, unless Adrian posts his
list of know regressions, most of the people doesn't look at the bugzilla
at all. Maybe it'd be useful to create a per-release bug tracker in the
bugzilla or collect them into one of the a kernel.org's wiki, to make easier
to follow the current state of all the "important" regressions.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Linux 2.6.21
    ... Apparently, unless Adrian posts his ... bugzilla or collect them into one of the a kernel.org's wiki, ... to follow the current state of all the "important" regressions. ... have some human who tries to find messages on the kernel mailing list too, ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Linux 2.6.21
    ... As usual, I'd like to thank Adrian for keeping everybody on their toes with the regression list - there's a few entries there still, but it got to the point where we didn't even know if they were real regressions, and delaying things further just wasn't going to help. ... I think you have done the perfect job, identifying the show stoppers, quantifying the obscure and minor regressions, and serving to give testing targets as purported fixes are applied. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Linux 2.6.21
    ... I'd like to thank Adrian (and ... > regressions, and delaying things further just wasn't going to help. ... developer manpower for handling them. ... people who spent their time testing -rc kernels. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
Quantcast