Re: [PATCH 1/3] ia64: convert to use clocksource code
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:41:46 +0200
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 04:26:32PM -0400, Peter Keilty wrote:
From: Peter Keilty <peter.keilty@xxxxxx>
Initial ia64 conversion to the generic timekeeping/clocksource code.
Signed-off-by: Peter Keilty <peter.keilty@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@xxxxxxxxxx>
The "Signed-off-by:" should reflect the order in which a path is processed
with the last submitter at the bottom of the list.
So if this patch came from John then he should be first in the list
and since the patch passes you and you submit it you should be in the bottom
of the list.
And "Signed-off-by:" tell the path that the patch takes. It is not to be used
to let others say "I have seen it and I think the patch is ok".
For the latter we have "Acked-by:".
I did not look at the code so ne feedback there.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] ia64: convert to use clocksource code
- From: john stultz
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] ia64: convert to use clocksource code
- References:
- [PATCH 1/3] ia64: convert to use clocksource code
- From: Peter Keilty
- [PATCH 1/3] ia64: convert to use clocksource code
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Kconfig: cleanup s390 v2.
- Next by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.21
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/3] ia64: update fsyscall for performance, enable build/run on 2.6.21-rc1
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ia64: convert to use clocksource code
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
