Re: can a kmalloc be both GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_KERNEL at the same time?



On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:

On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:40:39 -0400 (EDT) "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


i'd always assumed that the type flags of GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_KERNEL
were mutually exclusive when it came to calling kmalloc(), at least
based on everything i'd read. so i'm not sure how to interpret the
following:

drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c: aic_dev = kmalloc(sizeof(struct aic_dev_data), GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_KERNEL);
drivers/message/i2o/device.c: resblk = kmalloc(buflen + 8, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_ATOMIC);

clarification?

GFP_ATOMIC implies that the memory comes from the zones which
GFP_KERNEL also uses. So the above usage of GFP_KERNEL is redundant
and should be removed.

hang on ... based on an email i just got, is that reference to
GFP_KERNEL "redundant" or "conflicting"? big difference there. and
is the proper fix to remove "GFP_KERNEL" in both cases?

rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



Relevant Pages

  • Re: [patch 03/13] input: make input a multi-object module
    ... Andrew Morton wrote: ... input-ff.o from input.o so that input.c renaming is not required, ... use the input_dev->eventhandler instead of input.o calling ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • can a kmalloc be both GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_KERNEL at the same time?
    ... i'd always assumed that the type flags of GFP_ATOMIC and GFP_KERNEL ... were mutually exclusive when it came to calling kmalloc(), ... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: [patch] Let smp_call_function_single return -EBUSY.
    ... Andrew Morton wrote: ... If calling with preemption enabled is allowed then the powerpc implementation ... then the current thread might at any time migrate onto the target CPU, ... causing the smp_call_function_singleattempt to fail. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: 2.6.21-rc5-mm3
    ... On Sunday, 1 April 2007 21:03, Andrew Morton wrote: ... We're calling smp_call_functionwith local interrupts disabled, ... local irqs disabled and bad things happen. ... More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ...
    (Linux-Kernel)