Re: [patches] [PATCH] [8/35] x86_64: a memcpy that tries to reducecache pressure
- From: Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:14:13 -0700
Andi Kleen wrote:
Yes I remember, somehow it got lost. I agree it's a bad thing. Will drop
the patch for now especially since nothing seems to really need it right now.
It would be used by the ipath driver if it was around.
<b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] [0/35] Some x86 2.6.22 candidate patches for review
- From: Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] [8/35] x86_64: a memcpy that tries to reduce cache pressure
- From: Andi Kleen
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [8/35] x86_64: a memcpy that tries to reducecache pressure
- From: Jan Beulich
- Re: [patches] [PATCH] [8/35] x86_64: a memcpy that tries to reducecache pressure
- From: Andi Kleen
- [PATCH] [0/35] Some x86 2.6.22 candidate patches for review
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 10/12] i386: Introduce head32.c
- Next by Date: [PATCH 09/12] i386/x86_64: EHCI usb debug port early printk support.
- Previous by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [8/35] x86_64: a memcpy that tries to reducecache pressure
- Next by thread: Re: [patches] [PATCH] [8/35] x86_64: a memcpy that tries to reducecache pressure
- Index(es):
