Re: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:

it's just a prototype, so no code is generated by declaring one
to an unused (or even non-existant) function.

Or are you using some oddball compiler that warns about this?


If you consider gcc to be oddball, yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions
    ... On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote: ... >> to an unused (or even non-existant) function. ... >> Or are you using some oddball compiler that warns about this? ... Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions
    ... >> to an unused (or even non-existant) function. ... >> Or are you using some oddball compiler that warns about this? ... > If you consider gcc to be oddball, ... Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: [patch] cpufreq: do not declare undefined functions
    ... to an unused (or even non-existant) function. ... Or are you using some oddball compiler that warns about this? ... If you consider gcc to be oddball, ... Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ...
    (Linux-Kernel)