Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/4] SoC base drivers: SoC helper API
- From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 20:08:03 +0100
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:08:27AM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
+void soc_free_devices(struct platform_device *devices, int nr_devs)
+{
+ struct platform_device *dev = devices;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < nr_devs; i++) {
+ struct resource *res = dev->resource;
+ platform_device_unregister(dev++);
+ kfree(res);
+ }
+ kfree(devices);
Utterly unsafe. Repeat after me: kfreeing the memory assocated with any
kobject is asking for an OOPS. Do not do it.
There's a reason that platform_device_alloc() and friends exist. If you
want to unregister platform devices, use those functions. Don't try to
invent your own buggy variants.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC, PATCH 1/4] SoC base drivers: SoC helper API
- From: Paul Sokolovsky
- [RFC, PATCH 1/4] SoC base drivers: SoC helper API
- Prev by Date: Re: fragmentation avoidance Re: 2.6.22 -mm merge plans
- Next by Date: Re: [Kernel-discuss] Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC, PATCH 1/4] SoC base drivers: SoC helper API
- Next by thread: [RFC, PATCH 0/4] SoC base drivers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|