Re: [NETLINK] Don't attach callback to a going-away netlink socket
- From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 14:12:22 +1000
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 11:18:49PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
Herbert, could you refresh this refinement to the current
tree?
Dave, thanks for reminding me. Here it is.
[NETLINK]: Kill CB only when socket is unused
Since we can still receive packets until all references to the
socket are gone, we don't need to kill the CB until that happens.
This also aligns ourselves with the receive queue purging which
happens at that point.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 42d2fb9..7fc6b4d 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -140,6 +140,15 @@ static struct hlist_head *nl_pid_hashfn(struct nl_pid_hash *hash, u32 pid)
static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
{
+ struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
+
+ BUG_ON(mutex_is_locked(nlk_sk(sk)->cb_mutex));
+ if (nlk->cb) {
+ if (nlk->cb->done)
+ nlk->cb->done(nlk->cb);
+ netlink_destroy_callback(nlk->cb);
+ }
+
skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
@@ -148,7 +157,6 @@ static void netlink_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
}
BUG_TRAP(!atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc));
BUG_TRAP(!atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc));
- BUG_TRAP(!nlk_sk(sk)->cb);
BUG_TRAP(!nlk_sk(sk)->groups);
}
@@ -456,17 +464,10 @@ static int netlink_release(struct socket *sock)
sock_orphan(sk);
nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
- mutex_lock(nlk->cb_mutex);
- if (nlk->cb) {
- if (nlk->cb->done)
- nlk->cb->done(nlk->cb);
- netlink_destroy_callback(nlk->cb);
- nlk->cb = NULL;
- }
- mutex_unlock(nlk->cb_mutex);
-
- /* OK. Socket is unlinked, and, therefore,
- no new packets will arrive */
+ /*
+ * OK. Socket is unlinked, any packets that arrive now
+ * will be purged.
+ */
sock->sk = NULL;
wake_up_interruptible_all(&nlk->wait);
@@ -1426,9 +1427,9 @@ int netlink_dump_start(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb,
return -ECONNREFUSED;
}
nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
- /* A dump or destruction is in progress... */
+ /* A dump is in progress... */
mutex_lock(nlk->cb_mutex);
- if (nlk->cb || sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD)) {
+ if (nlk->cb) {
mutex_unlock(nlk->cb_mutex);
netlink_destroy_callback(cb);
sock_put(sk);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [NETLINK] Don't attach callback to a going-away netlink socket
- From: David Miller
- Re: [NETLINK] Don't attach callback to a going-away netlink socket
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] zero_user_page uses in fs/buffer.c and fs/libfs.c
- Next by Date: Re: netfront for review
- Previous by thread: Re: netfront for review
- Next by thread: Re: [NETLINK] Don't attach callback to a going-away netlink socket
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
