RE: e1000 issue on DQ965GF board (was 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel)
- From: "Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 08:56:02 -0700
Yes, this was discovered through code inspection last week and I've
already made a fix (as I mentioned to Auke off-thread). It should be
submitted upstream shortly.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kok, Auke [mailto:auke-jan.h.kok@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 8:37 AM
To: Michel Lespinasse
Cc: Kok, Auke-jan H; Chuck Ebbert; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dave
Jones; cramerj; Ronciak, John; Brandeburg, Jesse; Kirsher, Jeffrey T;
Allan, Bruce W
Subject: Re: e1000 issue on DQ965GF board (was 24 lost ticks with
2.6.20.10 kernel)
[Adding Bruce to the Cc, reply below]
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:14:52AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:into
I just checked and the fix I was referring to earlier didn't make it
fix. See2.6.21-final. You can get 2.6.21-git1 from kernel.org which has the
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/patch-2.6.21-git1.
log
kernel,
Good. So I tried that patch (well, actually only the change visible at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/6/268). I patched it into a 2.6.20.11
using the same config file as previously. The good news is that thisfixes
my issue: there are no lost ticks anymore, and the link does negotiatea
gigabit connection. This is a great improvement for me :)speed,
I still seem to hit an issue if using the ethtool command, though.
when using 'ethtool -s eth0 autoneg on', the link comes up at gigabit
but a couple seconds later is comes down again, and then up at 100megabits:
again,
e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog: NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex
e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog: NIC Link is Down
e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog: NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full Duplex
e1000: eth0: e1000_watchdog: 10/100 speed: disabling TSO
The same thing happens if I use ifdown eth0; ifup eth0 too. Once
I only observe this on my DQ965GF motherboard, the DG965RY board isfine
(stays at gigabit speed when I issue these commands).want me
Is this something you could easily reproduce at Intel or would you
to look into that issue on my system ?
I think we have confirmed this issue and I'll work with Bruce on seeing
where
the fix went. I might give you another patch to try.
Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Prev by Date: [MCA] fix bus matching
- Next by Date: [PATCH] UBI: dereference after kfree in create_vtbl
- Previous by thread: Re: e1000 issue on DQ965GF board (was 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel)
- Next by thread: Re: e1000 issue on DQ965GF board (was 24 lost ticks with 2.6.20.10 kernel)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|