Re: Detecting process death for anycast named process monitoring
- From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 06:54:26 +0100
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 06:12:27PM -0500, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 16:30 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
Glen Turner wrote:
The question is, how can a process with no relationship to another
process detect that process unexpectedly dying? If named goes
away to a better place, we want to shut down the interface
which causes Quagga to inject the anycast route.
We did something similar where arbitrary processes can register to be
sent an arbitrary signal when the state of other processes change.
What about something like inotify, but for processes? That would be
cool...
Or maybe just ignoring the SIGHUP before exec'ing the named process as
a child.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Detecting process death for anycast named process monitoring
- From: Glen Turner
- Re: Detecting process death for anycast named process monitoring
- From: Chris Friesen
- Re: Detecting process death for anycast named process monitoring
- From: David M. Lloyd
- Detecting process death for anycast named process monitoring
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Power Management: use mutexes instead of semaphores
- Next by Date: Re: + per-cpuset-hugetlb-accounting-and-administration.patch added to -mm tree
- Previous by thread: Re: Detecting process death for anycast named process monitoring
- Next by thread: Re: Detecting process death for anycast named process monitoring
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
