Re: [PATCH -mm] PM: Separate hibernation code from suspend code
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 15:50:52 +0200
On Saturday, 5 May 2007 14:27, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Power off the system instead of halting it if the 'platform' mode of
hibernation
has been requested, but hibernation_ops is not set.
Ehm, unless you made a mistake in the patch then that shouldn't be
possible.
Hmm, right, but the patch is correct nevertheless. :-)
I see where the problem is. hibernation_mode is 0 by default
(HIBERNATION_INVALID) and it's not changed to anything else later if
defaults are used.
Something like this is necessary, I think:
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Make sure that hibernation_mode is set to a reasonable value by default.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
---
kernel/power/disk.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.21/kernel/power/disk.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.21.orig/kernel/power/disk.c 2007-05-05 13:51:45.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.21/kernel/power/disk.c 2007-05-05 15:45:23.000000000 +0200
@@ -30,8 +30,6 @@ char resume_file[256] = CONFIG_PM_STD_PA
dev_t swsusp_resume_device;
sector_t swsusp_resume_block;
-static int hibernation_mode;
-
enum {
HIBERNATION_INVALID,
HIBERNATION_PLATFORM,
@@ -45,6 +43,8 @@ enum {
#define HIBERNATION_MAX (__HIBERNATION_AFTER_LAST-1)
#define HIBERNATION_FIRST (HIBERNATION_INVALID + 1)
+static int hibernation_mode = HIBERNATION_SHUTDOWN;
+
struct hibernation_ops *hibernation_ops;
/**
@@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ void hibernation_set_ops(struct hibernat
}
mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
hibernation_ops = ops;
+ if (ops)
+ hibernation_mode = HIBERNATION_PLATFORM;
+
mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH -mm] PM: Separate hibernation code from suspend code
- From: Johannes Berg
- Re: [PATCH -mm] PM: Separate hibernation code from suspend code
- From: Pavel Machek
- Re: [PATCH -mm] PM: Separate hibernation code from suspend code
- References:
- [PATCH -mm] PM: Separate hibernation code from suspend code
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- Re: [PATCH -mm] PM: Separate hibernation code from suspend code
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- Re: [PATCH -mm] PM: Separate hibernation code from suspend code
- From: Johannes Berg
- [PATCH -mm] PM: Separate hibernation code from suspend code
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] PM: Separate hibernation code from suspend code
- Next by Date: Re: [SOLVED] Serial buffer corruption [was Re: FTDI usb-serial possible bug]
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm] PM: Separate hibernation code from suspend code
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH -mm] PM: Separate hibernation code from suspend code
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|