Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
- From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 22:15:18 +0300
On 5/8/07, Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > +typedef __be16 be16;
> > +typedef __be32 be32;
> > +typedef __be64 be64;
>
> Why are those typedefs necessary ?
Not strictly. I tend to use the be* types fairly often in the code and
simply grew weary of seeing the underscores.
Any objections if I seperate out the userspace headers and keep the
shorthands for kernel code only?
Not sure what you mean but I would prefer you drop the typedefs completely.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
- From: Jörn Engel
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
- References:
- [PATCH 0/2] LogFS take two
- From: Jörn Engel
- [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
- From: Jörn Engel
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
- From: Thomas Gleixner
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
- From: Jörn Engel
- [PATCH 0/2] LogFS take two
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.21 -- Lid button won't initiate suspend. Also, suspend didn't enter low-power state until I touched my mousepad.
- Next by Date: Re: [linux-pm] 2.6.21 -- Forced to hard power off from attempted hibernation
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2] LogFS proper
- Index(es):