Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: "Duane Griffin" <duaneg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 20:53:13 +0100
On 16/05/07, Prakash Punnoor <prakash@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Maybe you want to give a hint in the p states driver help text?
I think a hint is the right thing to do, but in the PowerNow! driver
rather than the p states one. How about adding something like this to
the X86_POWERNOW_K8 (and X86_POWERNOW_K7?) help text:
"ACPI support is required for non-UP systems and requires ACPI_PROCESSOR
to be selected. If ACPI_PROCESSOR is compiled as a module then this
option must be too in order for ACPI support to be available."
Cheers,
Duane.
--
"I never could learn to drink that blood and call it wine" - Bob Dylan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Joshua Hoblitt
- Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Prakash Punnoor
- [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- Next by Date: RE: scheduling oddity on 2.6.20.3 stock
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- Index(es):