Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Joshua Hoblitt <jhoblitt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:27:36 -1000
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 04:04:40PM -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
Duane Griffin wrote:
On 16/05/07, Prakash Punnoor <prakash@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Maybe you want to give a hint in the p states driver help text?
I think a hint is the right thing to do, but in the PowerNow! driver
rather than the p states one. How about adding something like this to
the X86_POWERNOW_K8 (and X86_POWERNOW_K7?) help text:
Please hold off this patch until we've gained a more complete
understanding of the issues and workarounds (which will probably lead to
us writing a better patch anyway)
I agree - the issue is more complicated that I had thought. I received
an off list message saying that this dependency isn't required on a
single-socket Athlon X2 system. So it sounds like isn't an SMP setup
issue as much as it is a multi-socket or perhaps just an issue with my
vendor (Tyan).
-J
--
Attachment:
pgp3etcCKd3zi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Joshua Hoblitt
- Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Prakash Punnoor
- Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Duane Griffin
- Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- From: Daniel Drake
- [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/5] make slab gfp fair
- Next by Date: Re: v2.6.21-rt2
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Kconfig powernow-k8 driver should depend on ACPI P-States driver
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|