Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
What happened to:
"Fix ACPI suspend / device suspend ordering problem"
52ade9b3b97fd3bea42842a056fe0786c28d0555
I would suggest waiting on problem reports for that one a bit longer.
Maybe it fixes everything, and has no downsides. But the problem it fixed
isn't new, and the order change certainly has the _potential_ to be scary.
Do we have reports of that one fixing a lot of machines? I know of only
one person it made a difference for..
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Chris Wright
- Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- References:
- [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Chris Wright
- Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- From: Chuck Ebbert
- [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Prev by Date: Fix up CodingStyle in isofs.
- Next by Date: Re: bug in 2.6.22-rc2: loop mount limited to one single iso image
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|