Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx/aicasm build failure w/gcc-3.4.6
- From: rct@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Bob Tracy)
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 10:11:47 -0500 (CDT)
James Bottomley wrote:
We really don't want gcc making assumptions about prototypes ... even if
it's getting them right in all likelihood (doubtless unprototyped
assumed functions will become a warning and then an error in later gcc
versions ...), so this is a better fix
ACK. The fix works here. If you would be so kind, please push it
upstream at your convenience.
gcc-4.X violates the principle of least astonishment over even more
nitnoid matters, but that's another flame for another day.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Tracy | "Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get
rct@xxxxxxxx | sucked into jet engines." --Anon
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx/aicasm build failure w/gcc-3.4.6
- From: James Bottomley
- Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx/aicasm build failure w/gcc-3.4.6
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 00/33] xen: Xen paravirt_ops implementation
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: kconfig select warnings bogus?
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx/aicasm build failure w/gcc-3.4.6
- Next by thread: [PATCH 2.6.21.1] hisax: adds error-checking for hisax_register()
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading