Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Michael-Luke Jones <mlj28@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 11:53:37 +0100
On 23 May 2007, at 09:27, Nitin Gupta wrote:
This contains LZO1X-1 compressor and LZO1X decompressor (safe and
standard version).
I understand that the 'safe' decompression code is 'somewhat slower' and that decompressor performance is a key feature of this algorithm. However, I am concerned about the safety implications of including the 'unsafe' standard version in-kernel when likely uses include compression of network data, memory objects and so-on, all of which could in theory be maliciously modified.
I'm no kernel or programming expert, so I may be off the mark with this one. To me, at least, even if the answer is 'no, there isn't a problem' that's still a valuable clarification :)
Thanks,
Michael-Luke Jones
[please cc me on replies as I am not subscribed to lkml]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Nitin Gupta
- Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- References:
- [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- From: Nitin Gupta
- [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] file as directory
- Next by Date: Re: bad networking related lag in v2.6.22-rc2
- Previous by thread: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading