Re: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:23:01 -0700
Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
Yes. But it only has 3 features defined right now. 2 in EAX and one in
ECX. Should I use 2 new words for these bits or just use the software
defined bits as in my earlier patch?
Oh for heaven's sake. Could you please do the world a favour and shoot
your CPUID architect?
The real answer depends on how you expect it to grow in the future.
Intel has a piss-poor record at being consistent in this matter, which
speaks for a more ad hoc approach, but if there really is a sane growth
path going forward, then go ahead and define two new words.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
- From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
- RE: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
- References:
- RE: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
- From: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
- RE: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
- Prev by Date: Re: pcmcia resume 60 second hang. Re: [patch 00/69] -stable review
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v12
- Previous by thread: RE: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
- Next by thread: RE: [PATCH] Display Intel Dynamic Acceleration feature in /proc/cpuinfo
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|