Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
- From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 09:37:11 -0400
Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
just curious, what makes you think that AHCI is better wrt performance?
NCQ support, CPU cycle savings, no silly DMA limits (supports larger clustered chunks of data, less bouncing), supports 64-bit (no bouncing on 64-bit), eliminates use of PIO, the list goes on.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
- From: Robert Han***
- Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
- From: Holger Eitzenberger
- Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 4
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] LZO de/compression support - take 4
- Previous by thread: Re: IDE/ATA: Intel i865-based mainboard, CDROM not detected
- Next by thread: applesmc - sensors patch missing from 2.6.22-rc2
- Index(es):
Loading