Re: [PATCH] sendfile removal
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:53:22 +0200
On Thu, May 31 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2007 12:33:16 +0200
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
This patch removes the ->sendfile() hook from the file_operations
structure, and replaces the sys_sendfile() mechanism to be based on
->splice_read() instead. There should be no functional changes.
- retval = in_file->f_op->sendfile(in_file, ppos, count, file_send_actor, out_file);
+ fl = 0;
+ if (in_file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK)
+ fl = SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK;
+
+ retval = do_splice_direct(in_file, ppos, out_file, count, fl);
I like this, but are you sure it wont break user land ?
Some applications might react badly if sendfile() returns EAGAIN ?
Yeah, I didn't actually intend for that to sneak in. I'd think that
userspace should handle it if they opened the file O_NONBLOCK (or used
fcntl()), but it's a change in behaviour none the less and probably not
a good idea.
Encourage those people to use splice() instead :-)
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] sendfile removal
- From: Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH] sendfile removal
- From: Eric Dumazet
- [PATCH] sendfile removal
- Prev by Date: Re: Syslets, Threadlets, generic AIO support, v6
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] sendfile removal
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sendfile removal
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sendfile removal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
