Re: [PATCH] sendfile removal
- From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 14:27:23 +0200
On Thu, May 31 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday May 31, jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, May 31 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:33:16PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
- nfds: The ->rq_sendfile_ok optimization is gone for now. I can't
determine the value of it, but I'm assuming it's there for a reason.
Any chance this can be converted to splice, or use something else than
->sendfile()? CC'ed Neil.
sendfile useage in nfsd avoids a data copy and allows to use checksum
offloading. it's quite important for nfs server workloads.
OK, I hope Neil can provide some input on how to convert it. Of course
I'm just fishing for Neil to actually do that work :-)
Well, seeing you did that zero-length-barrier thing for me, how can I
complain :-)
I'll have a look in the morning.
Woo, thanks Neil :-)
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] sendfile removal
- From: Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH] sendfile removal
- From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH] sendfile removal
- From: Jens Axboe
- Re: [PATCH] sendfile removal
- From: Neil Brown
- [PATCH] sendfile removal
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.
- Next by Date: Re: Case: 7454422: Re: Kernel 2.6.21.3 does not work with 8GB of RAM on Intel 965WH motherboards. (FULL DMESG)
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sendfile removal
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sendfile removal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
