Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 11:32:15 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Nicholas Miell wrote:
O_CLOSEONEXEC, perhaps?
Then nobody would know this is equivalent to FD_CLOEXEC. I think the
name I propose is fine.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGXxSv2ijCOnn/RHQRAhELAJ9/7pTQeZShV6NDfEx+iVSfD5g02gCeM/y+
E0GvuEg2EBtOmDdI5MEzOG0=
=W6hQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- From: Nicholas Miell
- [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc3-mm1
- Next by Date: Re: + loop-preallocate-eight-loop-devices.patch added to -mm tree
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
