Re: [PATCH] ACPI Debug - for test, devel and possibly even for production kernels
- From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 21:57:10 +0300
On 5/31/07, Thomas Renninger <trenn@xxxxxxx> wrote:
(This should efficiently be the same as the proposed big patch a year
ago from Pekka Enberg, just a bit smaller and should make ACPICA and
kernel/linux people happy:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=113699535303722&w=2)
No, you're keeping these obfuscating macros around:
+#define return_VOID return
+#define return_ACPI_STATUS(s) return(s)
+#define return_VALUE(s) return(s)
+#define return_UINT8(s) return(s)
Making the ACPI code look like regular Linux kernel code (or even
regular C for that matter) was the whole point of my patch. Your patch
doesn't change that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- [PATCH] ACPI Debug - for test, devel and possibly even for production kernels
- From: Thomas Renninger
- [PATCH] ACPI Debug - for test, devel and possibly even for production kernels
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.22-rc3-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] ACPI Debug - for test, devel and possibly even for production kernels
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] ACPI Debug - for test, devel and possibly even for production kernels
- Index(es):