Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 22:01:09 +0200
* K.R. Foley <kr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* K.R. Foley <kr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ingo,
I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to
2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3.
yes - it includes all of 2.6.21.3.
Ingo
So actually it is not really misnamed, it's just done a bit
differently than previous versions. Sorry.
yeah. Maybe we should make the 2.6.21.3 -rt patches relative to 2.6.21.3
- but that would be one extra patching step for people who already have
a 2.6.21 tree. But ... maybe that makes the most sense after all.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- From: K.R. Foley
- Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- References:
- patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- From: K.R. Foley
- Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- From: K.R. Foley
- patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] add a trivial patch style checker II
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v3)
- Previous by thread: Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- Next by thread: Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
