Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Davide Libenzi wrote:
What I meant, was that the vast majority of MT+exec
apps wants all their fds (but an handfull, maybe)
You never listen when you are told something. Such a statement cannot
be made. The application doesn't know what the runtime libraries need
(not just libc, libstdc++, libxml, whatever) and vice versa. Policies
are always wrong for somebody and changing the standardized behavior is
not acceptable.
I do always listen when you make a good point. And this is a good one.
Some libraries might not like a global behaviour change, I agree.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- From: Davide Libenzi
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- From: Davide Libenzi
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- From: Davide Libenzi
- Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- From: Ulrich Drepper
- [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- Prev by Date: Re: floppy.c soft lockup
- Next by Date: [PATCH] acpi: fix section mismatch warning in asus_acpi.o
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Introduce O_CLOEXEC (take >2)
- Index(es):