Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- From: "K.R. Foley" <kr@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 16:06:25 -0500
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* K.R. Foley <kr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* K.R. Foley <kr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:So actually it is not really misnamed, it's just done a bit
Ingo,yes - it includes all of 2.6.21.3.
I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to
2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3.
Ingo
differently than previous versions. Sorry.
yeah. Maybe we should make the 2.6.21.3 -rt patches relative to 2.6.21.3
- but that would be one extra patching step for people who already have
a 2.6.21 tree. But ... maybe that makes the most sense after all.
Ingo
Well don't change any of this on my account. Whatever is easiest for
everyone else is fine with me. I was merely pointing it out to possibly
help someone else out rather than as a complaint.
--
kr
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- From: K.R. Foley
- Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- From: K.R. Foley
- Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- From: Ingo Molnar
- patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 5/5] serial: assert DTR for serial console devices
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 8/9] F00F bug fixup for i386 - use conditional calls
- Previous by thread: Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?
- Next by thread: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v15
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
