Re: [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc4] sysfs: fix race conditions
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 23:12:03 -0700
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:01:07 +0900 Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Currently, there are several race conditions around dentry/inode
reclamation.
a. sysfs_dirent->s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_readdir()
b. sysfs_dirent->s_dentry dereferencing in sysfs_drop_dentry()
c. sysfs_dirent->s_dentry clearing in sysfs_d_iput()
All aboves are done without synchronization and can cause oops if the
timing is right (or wrong).
These race conditions are difficult to trigger but with the attached
patch (sysfs-races.patch) and the following commands running
parallelly, all three are reliably reproducible (you may have to
change timings or disable others to trigger specific one).
1. while true; do insmod drivers/ata/libata.ko; insmod drivers/ata/ata_piix.ko; sleep 1; rmmod ata_piix; rmmod libata; sleep 1; echo -n . ; done
2. while true; do find /sys -type f | xargs cat > /dev/null; echo -n .; sleep 1; done
3. while true; do find /sys/class/scsi_disk -type f | sort | xargs cat > /dev/null; echo -n .; sleep 1; done
4. while true; do umount /sys; sleep 1; mount /sys; sleep 1; echo -n .; done
#1 assumes there are several devices attached to ata_piix controller.
Change #1 to any module or command which creates and removes sysfs
nodes repeatedly and adjust #3 to cat those sysfs nodes.
All known race conditions are fixed in the current -mm. #a is
replaced by adding sd->s_ino and allocating unique ino with ida. #b
and #c are fixed during sysfs_drop_dentry() rewrite. However, those
changes were too big to apply to 2.6.22-rcX or any stable branches.
This patchset contains three minimal backports of fixes in -mm. With
all patches in the patchset and sysfs-races.patch applied, kernel
survived ~20 hours of stress test without any problem.
So these are being proposed for 2.6.22?
I do wonder about Rafael's bug which he bisected down to
gregkh-driver-sysfs-use-singly-linked-list-for-sysfs_dirent-tree.patch.
If that won't be a problem in this patchset then I spose it's probably best
to go ahead with a 2.6.22 merge, but it's more a Greg thing than a me
thing.
I don't have a tree to merge these patches into, unless I drop all the
patches which are in Greg's tree.
Greg, can I leave it up to you to decide how we are to proceed here?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc4] sysfs: fix race conditions
- From: Tejun Heo
- Re: [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc4] sysfs: fix race conditions
- References:
- [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc4] sysfs: fix race conditions
- From: Tejun Heo
- [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc4] sysfs: fix race conditions
- Prev by Date: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc4] sysfs: fix race conditions
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/3] sysfs: fix condition check in sysfs_drop_dentry()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCHSET 2.6.22-rc4] sysfs: fix race conditions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|