Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 08:42:51 +1000
Hi.
Wouldn't it be much more useful if it was unconditionally compiled in
and controlled instead by a sysfs entry? That way it will be far more
useful to $user who doesn't know or want to know how to compile and
install a kernel, but wants to do what they can to get provide helpful
debugging info and perhaps even get it going.
Yes, Pavel, I'll supply a patch if you (plural) agree.
Regards,
Nigel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- References:
- beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- From: Pavel Machek
- Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- From: Andrew Morton
- beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/1] UML: fix missing non-blocking I/O, now DEBUG_SHIRQ works
- Next by Date: Re: [patch-mm 00/23] High resolution timer updates and x86_64 support
- Previous by thread: Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- Next by thread: Re: beeping patch for debugging acpi sleep
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|