Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:21:48 -0300
On Jun 15, 2007, "Scott Preece" <sepreece@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 6/15/07, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 15, 2007, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
it irreversibly cuts off certain people from being to distribute
GPLv3-ed software alongside with certain types of hardware that the
FSF's president does not like.
That's not true. They can just as well throw the key away and refrain
from modifying the installed software behind the users' back.
This characterization misses something important. For many product
devices, like cell phones, the modification is never "behind the
user's back"
Okay, take out the "behind the users' back", it makes no difference.
That was just to highlight the frequent evil intentions behind keeping
the keys.
I wonder if giving half the key to the user and keeping the other half
would be enough to satisfy the GPLv3 language while still enabling the
vendor and user to update the software together.
The FSF's approval of this distinction (ROM versus replaceable) places
the FSF's particular principles over users interests, for no
particular reason
Over *users* interest? How so?
if the manufacturer believes that it cannot legally allow software
modification, all the restriction does is force them either to make
the software unmodifiable (which advances freedom not at all) or to
use software under a different license (which advances freedom not
at all).
Right.
But if the manufacturer believes that it can legally allow it, and
wants to be able to install, software modifications, then it must
decide between giving that up and letting the user do it as well. And
this is where the users interests may prevail.
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Scott Preece
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- References:
- Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Tarkan Erimer
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alan Cox
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Rob Landley
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Ingo Molnar
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- From: Scott Preece
- Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] selective signal ptracing
- Next by Date: Re: RFC: Re: PATCH: udf fs corruption on linux-2.6
- Previous by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Next by thread: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|