Re: [PATCH] signed binaries support [0/4]
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 19:23:44 +0200
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 06:29:17PM +0200, Alexander Wuerstlein wrote:
On 070621 18:19, Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 05:55:16PM +0200, Johannes Schlumberger wrote:
Hi,
Hi Johannes,
We (two students of CS) built a system for signing binaries and verifying them
before executing. Our main focus was to implement a way to inhibit execution
of suid-binaries, which are not trustworthy (i.e. not signed).
...
doesn't anyone who is able to install a not trustworthy suid-binary
already have the priviliges to do anything he wants to without requiring
an suid bit?
Yes, quite correct in most cases. But if you have taken control of a computer
on of the more common ways to keep the control for some time is the
installation of a suid-binary (e.g. as part of a rootkit).
There are so many ways for manipulating a computer that controlling
setuid binaries hardly brings a real security gain.
One could also imagine a scenario where an attacker controls some filesystems
(on external storage perhaps) where he can of course manipulate the suid bit,
but he does not have direct control over the attacked system unless he can
execute that file.
And unless the filesystem is mounted without nosuid...
Ciao,
Alexander Wuerstlein.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] signed binaries support [0/4]
- From: Alexander Wuerstlein
- Re: [PATCH] signed binaries support [0/4]
- References:
- [PATCH] signed binaries support [0/4]
- From: Johannes Schlumberger
- Re: [PATCH] signed binaries support [0/4]
- From: Adrian Bunk
- Re: [PATCH] signed binaries support [0/4]
- From: Alexander Wuerstlein
- [PATCH] signed binaries support [0/4]
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] Chinese translation of Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt
- Next by Date: Re: Adding subroot information to /proc/mounts, or obtaining that through other means
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] signed binaries support [0/4]
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] signed binaries support [0/4]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|