Re: Documentation of kernel messages (Summary)
- From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:05:57 +0200
I find "document messages" to be a horrible idea conceptually, because I think
the messages should _be_ documentation. If the message is unclear it should
be clarified. "There's too much garbage on the floor, we should laminate it
so we can't smell it anymore." Er, no...
"Document message" is for the cases where the message itself does not convey
enough info.
No need to add more text when the initial message is good enough.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages
- From: holzheu
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages
- From: Andrew Morton
- Documentation of kernel messages (Summary)
- From: Michael Holzheu
- Re: Documentation of kernel messages (Summary)
- From: Rob Landley
- [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] mm-controller
- Next by Date: Re: Rules on how to use sysfs in userspace programs
- Previous by thread: Re: Documentation of kernel messages (Summary)
- Next by thread: Re: Documentation of kernel messages (Summary)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|