Re: [RFC] fsblock
- From: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:05:31 +1000
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 07:32:45AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
I think using fsblock to drive the IO and keep the pagecache flags
uptodate and using a btree in the filesystem to manage extents of block
allocations wouldn't be a bad idea though. Do any filesystems actually
do this?
Yes. XFS. But we still need to hold state in buffer heads (BH_delay,
BH_unwritten) that is needed to determine what type of
allocation/extent conversion is necessary during writeback. i.e.
what we originally mapped the page as during the ->prepare_write
call.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC] fsblock
- From: Nick Piggin
- Re: [RFC] fsblock
- From: David Chinner
- Re: [RFC] fsblock
- From: Nick Piggin
- Re: [RFC] fsblock
- From: David Chinner
- Re: [RFC] fsblock
- From: Chris Mason
- Re: [RFC] fsblock
- From: Nick Piggin
- [RFC] fsblock
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] Fix the warning when running make tags
- Next by Date: Re: [BUG] long freezes on thinkpad t60
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] fsblock
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] fsblock
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|