Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 19:20:52 +0200
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 09:32:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:47:52 +0300 Dan Aloni <da-x@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 02:54:25AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:51:53 -0700 "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some extensions to the popular E-Mail clients might be needed
here. Also, a bot reading LKML would automatically send links
about posted patches to the other mailing lists whenever
someone forgets to add a CC.
Any comments?
an easier way to implement this is to add an extra field in the MAINTAINERS
file, something like below. All the contact info would stay the same, closely
where applicable and it would allow you to also specify specific files as well.
We already have that information in git. Parse the git changelogs of the
affected files, find out who works on them.
I think it's quite complex to make a reliable inference of maintainership
information from git.
Clever people will work it out.
I don't see how git could tell you to Cc net patches to
netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Given a set of historical modifiers of a file,
would you take the most common commiter(s), or the most common
_recent_ commiter(s), or what? It's a bit fuzzy.
All the above? Multiply frequency by recency, pick the top five?
Doesn't matter much: the cost of picking too many is high.
I shudder at the thought of manually maintaining anything like this.
Auke suggestion of an additional field in MAINTAINERS makes sense - and
it leaves it to the maintainers to maintain it similar to the other
information there.
Independent of whatever software Dan wants to write it would also solve
problems like the one that MAINTAINERS currently isn't really good in
telling e.g. who is maintaining drivers/net/wireless/.
Moreover, it is slow in comparison and assumes the availability of
local .git db, which wouldn't be the case for some porition of patch
submitters.
a) precalculate the tables once per week
b) the whole thing wouldn't succeed if it requires software at
patch-submitter's site. It'd need to run at vger.
It might depend on what use cases you think of and whom you expect to
use it.
For me, a tool that simply tells me whom to Cc for a patch would be a
great tool.
What you suggest would be something completely different.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission
- From: Dan Aloni
- Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission
- From: Kok, Auke
- Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission
- From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission
- From: Dan Aloni
- Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission
- From: Andrew Morton
- [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS (with new syscalls API) - new version
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] automatic CC generation for patch submission
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|