Re: [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction
- From: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 07:32:31 -0700
Hi, Pavel,
Pavel Emelianov wrote:
Balbir Singh wrote:
As far as I remember at OLS we decided to implement per-zone RLU
lists and reuse the lru lock as well. This will remove all the
problems with per-container lists inconsistency.
It's there in the TODO list. It is easy to implement. I can do that
in the next revision. We are re-using the LRU lock, since the
isolate_pages callback is called under the zone's LRU lock.
Separate limits for RSS and RSS+pagecache are also a must.
I remember that we discussed having one limit, but we can come up
with a configuration parameter to do it. I'll do that in the
next release.
BTW, if you send smb. else's patches you may include a 'From: xxx'
line into the letter to address the original author.
I'll do that for the res_counters_infra patch. Although I had used
res_counter, the hooks in mm_struct earlier (http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/19/12).
A lot of the code for the reclaim logic and the meta_page is yours.
Please do identify patches where you would like to see your
signed-off-by and where you think the entire patch is completely
yours.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction
- From: Balbir Singh
- Re: [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction
- From: Pavel Emelianov
- [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction
- Prev by Date: Re: Versioning file system
- Next by Date: Re: removing refrigerator does not help with s2ram vs. fuse deadlocks (was Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway)
- Previous by thread: Re: [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction
- Next by thread: Re: [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|