Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23

From: Matt Mackall <mpm@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:06:46 -0500

On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 06:37:42PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:

On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Matt Mackall wrote:

You're delusional.

Git log says otherwise:

git log --pretty=short mm/slob.c

A dozen trivial cleanups do not make you maintainer. Otherwise we'd
all be sending our patches to Adrian rather than Linus.

--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
  - From: Christoph Lameter

References:
- Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
  - From: Nick Piggin
- Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
  - From: Christoph Lameter
- Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
  - From: Andrew Morton
- Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
  - From: Christoph Lameter
- Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
  - From: Nick Piggin
- Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
  - From: Christoph Lameter
- Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
  - From: Nick Piggin
- Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
  - From: Christoph Lameter
- Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
  - From: Matt Mackall
- Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
  - From: Christoph Lameter

Prev by Date: Re: queued spinlock code and results
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/7] fallocate() implementation in i386, x86_64 and powerpc
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
Next by thread: Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: This is [Re:] How to improve the quality of the kernel[?].
... New Patches need tracking, review, testing ... First is mostly done by maintainers or interested individuals. ... Linus by the maintainer. ... additions automaticly gathered and inserted to e-mail sent to BTS. ...
(Linux-Kernel)
Re: If you want me to quit I will quit
... or Linus applies patches directly bypassing the maintainers (like the ... If I am not cc'ed on a patch and have to resort to plucking it off the ... fuckup was Cc'ed to Linus (and I can't send it to -stable before it is ...
(Linux-Kernel)
[patch 0/8] mutex subsystem, ANNOUNCE
... the patches are against Linus' latest tree. ... - fixed the %eax clobber bug noticed by Linus. ... - optimization: in the xchgcase we can avoid hitting the slowpath ...
(Linux-Kernel)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] mm: tracking dirty pages -v11
... Your next spin should be against Linus' current git tree, ... You ought to respin, because the vma_wants_writenotify mods in mprotect.c ... affect later patches in your series, ...
(Linux-Kernel)
Re: RFD: Kernel release numbering
... Linus wrote: ... :The even/odd situation would have made for a situation that some people ... the major jump from 2.6.x to 2.6.x+1 for the developers, ... patches are cumulative (not the case in the past for patches on a Linus ...
(Linux-Kernel)