Re: [PATCH] isofs: mounting to regular file may succeed
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:08:14 +0100
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 12:04:07AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
I don't think any (all?) other filesystems perform checks like this.
Is this something which can/should be performed at the VFS level?
As far as the VFS is concerned non-directory mounts are perfectly fine.
There's a lot of use cases for non-directory bind-mounts and at least
some for regular filesystems with a non-directory root. E.g. the streams
folks are using something like that. Solaris even ships with non-directory
root filesystems mounted by default these days.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] isofs: mounting to regular file may succeed
- From: Kirill Kuvaldin
- Re: [PATCH] isofs: mounting to regular file may succeed
- From: Andrew Morton
- [PATCH] isofs: mounting to regular file may succeed
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 30/33] USB storage: sg chaining support
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 30/33] USB storage: sg chaining support
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] isofs: mounting to regular file may succeed
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] isofs: mounting to regular file may succeed
- Index(es):