Re: block/bsg.c
- From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 16:08:16 +0900
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: block/bsg.c
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:59:40 +0200
On Tue, Jul 17 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: block/bsg.c
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:38:11 +0200
On Mon, Jul 16 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
A belated review (I've never seen this before and there it is in mainline)
static char bsg_version[] = "block layer sg (bsg) 0.4";
`const' would be better. That moves it into a write-protected memory section.
Agree
#define list_entry_bc(entry) list_entry((entry), struct bsg_command, list)
This makes the code easier to write but harder to read. We should optimise
for readers. Please open-code this at callsites.
Or at least convert it into a (commented) (possibly inlined) C function.
list_entry_to_bc(), then? The main objective is to save on typing, and
(just as important) make sure we don't bump over the 80 chars per line.
/*
* just for testing
*/
#define BSG_MAJOR (240)
What's this doing in mainline? 240 is a "reserved for local use" major.
This will cause collisions. This code should be using dynamic major
assignment.
Yeah, that's a big error on my part. Will get that fixed up right away.
I've been testing the patchset to fix the issues that Andrew pointed
out. I can send it soon.
Jens, have you already fixed some?
I already pushed some of the changes locally, just the idr change is
missing. See the #bsg branch:
http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=shortlog;h=bsg
I see.
I'll ask for that to get pulled, and can I then assume that you will
look after bsg from now on?
I'm happy to do that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: block/bsg.c
- From: Jens Axboe
- Re: block/bsg.c
- References:
- Re: block/bsg.c
- From: Jens Axboe
- Re: block/bsg.c
- From: FUJITA Tomonori
- Re: block/bsg.c
- From: Jens Axboe
- Re: block/bsg.c
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 30/33] USB storage: sg chaining support
- Next by Date: Re: Hibernating To Swap Considered Harmful
- Previous by thread: Re: block/bsg.c
- Next by thread: Re: block/bsg.c
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|