Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
- From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 03:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:01:38 +0200
rae l wrote:
All in one word, I don't think the single file dev_mcast.c is needed
anymore.
Agreed. But dev.c is growing larger and larger, maybe dev_addr.c?
Or dev_config.c, with some of the other device configuration functions?
I don't know, a sizable dev.c is inevitable, allows better refactoring
and consolidation. And the be honest you're going to have to likely
touch things in dev.c whenever you make changes to dev_addr.c or
whatever you want to name it. :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
- From: Patrick McHardy
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
- References:
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
- From: David Miller
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
- From: rae l
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
- From: Patrick McHardy
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 03/33] powerpc: Refuse to build 64-bit with GCC-4.2.0 and CONFIG_MODULES
- Next by Date: Re: [2.6.23 PATCH 07/18] dm io: fix panic on large request
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [net/core] move dev_mc_discard from dev_mcast.c to dev.c
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|