Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 17:18:20 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 04:51:33PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:23:09 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day wrote:
there's no point adding all that redundant content when it can all be
done automatically.
I like it. Are there any kconfig patches to support this plan?
Speaking specifically to adding 'EXPERIMENTAL', I distinctly
remember at some point in the past the config system was smart
enough to print " (EXPERIMENTAL)" if that entry depended on
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL.
We should head in that direction.
there's one point i want to re-iterate. i'd prefer to see
EXPERIMENTAL stop being a dependency, as in:
depends on SNAFU && FUBAR && EXPERIMENTAL
"EXPERIMENTAL" is not a dependency in the true sense of the word
-- it is more of an attribute, and i think it would far more sense
to see entries like:
depends on SNAFU && FUBAR
maturity EXPERIMENTAL
Plus some special case in the kconfig code that you can somewhere
select the maturity levels you want to use (currently it's a normal
option kconfig doesn't have to know anything about).
i already described that here:
http://readlist.com/lists/vger.kernel.org/linux-kernel/66/334172.html
where the top-level config would look something like:
[*] Activate maturity attributes
[*] EXPERIMENTAL
[*] DEPRECATED
[*] OBSOLETE
[*] BROKEN
whereupon you could select any combination of the attributes you want
displayed *beyond the regular ones* during the config process.
Remind me, would there be any big advantage after such a change
besides being able to automatically print " (EXPERIMENTAL)" at the
end of the prompt?
defining a new Kconfig attribute means you can process it differently
from regular dependencies. and if it's added as a general feature, it
can be used for other possible attributes beyond just a maturity
level.
if you leave these maturity levels as regular dependencies, you're
going to have to brute force and manually process them, and why make
it that ugly?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://fsdev.net/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- From: Adrian Bunk
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- References:
- [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- From: Gabriel C
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- From: Robert P. J. Day
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- From: Randy Dunlap
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- From: Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- From: Robert P. J. Day
- Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- From: Adrian Bunk
- [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] fix cpu_llc_id section mismatch warning
- Next by Date: Re: sysfs root link count broken in 2.6.22-git5
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] net/, drivers/net/ , missing EXPERIMENTAL in menus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|